Friday, July 6, 2018

Can This Airline Weather Higher Fuel Prices Better Than Its Competitors?

Along with legacy carriers and low-cost carriers (LCCs), regional Latin American airline�Copa Holdings, S.A. (NYSE:CPA) has been buffeted by the rise in jet fuel over the last 18 months. After falling from nearly $3 per gallon all the way to $1 per gallon during 2014 and 2015 (and helping to generate record airline profits), jet fuel shifted course in early 2016, and market pricing has doubled over the last 30 months:

Line chart of weekly U.S. gulf coast jet fuel spot price, January 2016 - June 2018.

Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Chart by Author.

Copa Airlines may be singularly equipped to deal with the adverse effects of a spike in its biggest annual expense item. The Panama-headquartered carrier focuses primarily on flights within Central America, South America, and Mexico.

Collectively, Latin America's economy has improved tangibly as of late: Most of the major countries in the region have registered at least four consecutive quarters of improving gross domestic product (GDP).�Elevated economic activity is ratcheting up travel demand in both the business and leisure sectors. (I've written about this phenomenon recently in more detail in an article on Mexican airport operator Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico.)

The effect of Latin American travel demand is evident in several of Copa's metrics. In the first quarter of 2018, Copa Airline's passenger traffic grew 10.4%, outpacing a capacity increase of 8.4%. This pushed the airline's load factor (revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles) to 83%, a healthy increase of 1.5 percentage points over the prior year. Copa's yields (passenger revenue divided by passenger miles) also climbed during the first quarter. Yields per passenger mile advanced 5.3%, to $0.133.

Plane flying below clouds.

Image source: Getty Images.

The combination of higher loads and yields boosted revenue per available seat mile, or RASM, more than 7%, to $0.112. The advance in RASM outpaced a rise in cost per available seat miles (CASM). CASM creeped up 5.6%, from $0.086 in Q1 2017 to $0.091 this quarter. Non-fuel costs accounted for only $0.01 out of this $0.05 increase.

What's the net result of the stream of related statistics I've outlined above? High passenger demand is improving loads, yields, and revenue, thus offsetting the cost-per-mile increases wrought by climbing fuel costs. Copa was able to demonstrate a profitability increase during the first quarter, as operating margin improved 1.2 percentage points, to 20%.�

Of course, demand is an external factor -- vibrant today and potentially dimmed tomorrow. But Copa displays inherent advantages that also assist in managing fuel variances, such as its low-cost structure. The carrier employs a traditional hub-and-spoke network utilizing a single hub,�Tocumen International Airport in Panama City.

While a hub-and-spoke setup isn't typically as lean as point-to-point flights offered by LCCs, in Copa's case, the configuration keeps costs low. Panama City is strategically located on the isthmus connecting Central America with South America. This makes it an ideal location to efficiently service flights between the two regions, not to mention Mexico to the west, the U.S. to the north, and the Caribbean to the east.

To be specific, Copa's CASM is one of the lowest in the airline industry -- more in line with LCCs than legacy network carriers. First-quarter CASM of $0.091, for example, compares favorably to low-cost leader�Spirit Airlines�(NYSE:SAVE), which booked CASM of $0.0884 in the first quarter of 2018. Incidentally, Copa owns an incipient LCC brand, Wingo, which it launched in late 2016 to take over most of its Columbia flights. Wingo currently accounts for 2% of total company revenue.�

At least one more advantage is native to Copa's geographical focus. During the first-quarter earnings conference call, CEO Pedro Heilbron observed that higher fuel generates an offset in Latin American economies, as the currencies of oil exporters like Brazil and Argentina tend to firm up in concert with oil prices. Stronger local currencies positively affect Copa's yields. This has occurred only to a modest degree in the current cycle, although presumably, a sustained oil price increase will begin to bolster Latin American currencies.

Finally, as a relatively small regional carrier, Copa can more easily adjust capacity versus larger rivals in order to lift yields and absorb higher fuel expense. When asked about the carrier's willingness to do so, if needed, Heilbron was quick to cite prior instances in which Copa had trimmed capacity. Yet he also noted that the process of winnowing seats and/or flights isn't a magic bullet for neutralizing short-term fuel spikes.

Is Copa right for your portfolio?

In sum, a strategic focus within a high-demand region, an efficient network configuration, a low-cost structure, the potential benefit from rising Latin American currencies, and flexibility within capacity constraints all contribute to Copa's ability to weather oil inflation more capably than many of its industry peers.

These advantages aren't without risk. In the second quarter of 2018, the company expects to record a one-time charge of $15 million due to a temporary suspension of flights (now resumed) in Latin America's worst-performing economy -- Venezuela.�But despite such occasional challenges, Copa may prove a viable long-term investment for airline investors fretting over the seemingly inexorable, upward creep of jet fuel prices.

Thursday, June 28, 2018

How Much Money Can You Really Make Driving for Uber or Lyft?

If you're looking to make some money, the thought of being a driver for Uber or Lyft can be quite enticing. It can seem like work that's simple and painless enough -- picking people up and delivering them here and there -- but the amount you're likely to earn might surprise you.

The job itself might not be quite what you expected, either. Here's a look at how much money you can make as a driver for Lyft or Uber, along with some things to know about the gigs.

Man at the wheel of a car, looking back over his shoulder, presumably at a passenger

Image source: Getty Images.

How much can you really make driving for Uber or Lyft?

So...how much moola is there in driving for hire, as a part-time or full-time job? Well, one way to find out is via the horse's mouth: Take some rides as a customer and chat up the drivers. They may or may not tell you how much they make, but they'll likely offer insights into what the work is like and they may offer some tips, too. Like the most lucrative areas to target or the best time of day to pick up passengers.

The question of how much these drivers make has been in the news a bit recently, after MIT researchers published a shocking research report suggesting that drivers took in a median income of $3.37 per hour. They added that about three quarters are earning less than minimum wage, while almost a third are losing money. Yikes, right?

Well, it turned out they got some math wrong. There are various ways to measure the pay more accurately, the researchers conceded. One way yielded a median profit of $8.55 per hour, with 54% earning less than minimum wage in their states (as of 2016) and 8% losing money. Another way resulted in a median profit of $10 per hour, with 41% earning less than minimum wage and 4% losing money.

Here's what those two rates amount to by week, month, and year:

Hours Driven Per Week, at $8.55 Per Hour

Earned Per Week

Earned Per Month

Earned Per Year

10

$86

$371

$4,446

20

$171

$741

$8,892

30

$257

$1,112

$13,338

40

$342

$1,482

$17,784

50

$428

$1,853

$22,230

Data source: Author calculations.

Hours Driven Per Week, at $10 Per Hour

Earned Per Week

Earned Per Month

Earned Per Year

10

$100

$433

$5,200

20

$200

$867

$10,400

30

$300

$1,300

$15,600

40

$400

$1,733

$20,800

50

$500

$2,167

$26,000

Data source: Author calculations.

The horse's mouth

They're not the most objective sources, but it can still be worth seeing what the Uber and Lyft companies themselves say about how much you might earn driving for them.

Lyft offers a handy calculator where you can enter a city and how many hours you expect to drive there, and be informed how much you might make. Here are some sample results for someone estimating that they'd drive 20 hours per week in various large and small cities:

City

Estimated Weekly Income

Annual Equivalent

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Boston

Up to $480/week

Up to $24,960

Chicago

Up to $420/week

Up to $21,840

Davenport, Iowa

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Denver

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Honolulu

Up to $480/week

Up to $24,960

Houston

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Jacksonville, Florida

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Los Angeles

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

New York City

Up to $560/week

Up to $29,120

Portland, Maine

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

Providence, Rhode Island

Up to $400/week

Up to $20,800

San Francisco

Up to $540/week

Up to $28,080

Seattle

Up to $460/week

Up to $23,920

Data source: Lyft.com.

Uber, meanwhile, tells drivers or would-be drivers: "You can drive and earn as much as you want. And, the more you drive, the more you'll make." Its website doesn't seem to offer estimates of earnings, but its chief economist has pointed to two studies of earnings conducted in recent years that found average hourly earnings of $19.04 per hour and $21.07 per hour.

Another study, by the folks at NerdWallet, found that if you're looking to earn $50,000 per year driving, you would have to drive an average of about 60 trips weekly with Uber and about 84 with Lyft.

Other things to know

Before you invest much time or money signing up to drive for either of these services, do some digging into what the work is really like. If you're running numbers in your head, know that Uber takes 25% of each fare, while Lyft takes 20% to 25%. Remember that you'll be buying your own gasoline and insuring your own car -- though both companies offer insurance coverage during each ride. Your car will likely incur more maintenance costs, too, or won't last as long, if you're putting on a lot of miles driving for income. Also be sure to keep good records of your income and expenses, for tax purposes.

Despite the negative points, driving for Uber or Lyft or some other driving service can still be a good thing to do -- especially if it's just a side gig for some extra income (perhaps to help pay off debt), or if you're retired and looking for some income to augment your Social Security checks.